The Gustavian Weekly

Letter to the Editor (10/18/19) | The Gustavian Weekly

By Tegan Rodriguez | October 18, 2019 | Letters to the Editor

With the evolution of social media and access to creative outlets such as YouTube, there’s no doubt the makeup industry is booming with eager young adults looking for ways to express themselves or recommendations for quality products. Because of the global efforts surrounding recent brands who have taken a stand against animal testing the question of why some brands are continuing to harm innocent animals is now beginning to affect consumers and their choice of products.

Approximately 100,000 – 200,000 animals suffer and die from cosmetic testing every year world-wide and the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act does not require that testing on animals be done to prove that cosmetics are safe for consumers. This law makes it easy for companies to not disclose information on whether or not they are testing on animals. This leaves it in consumers’ hands to do background research on their own and to question if the products they are buying are environmentally and ethically conscious. As a consumer, we should care about where our money goes, the brands we support, and the ethical decisions made by companies. It’s also important to be aware that this problem does not only exist within the cosmetic industry, but others as well. These include fragrances, laundry products, and hygiene and dye companies that all test on animals and research must be done to be an informed, responsible buyer.

Many consumers believe supporting companies that follow similar morals and ethics to their own comes with a high price tag. This is not true. There are many drugstore makeup brands that label themselves as “animal friendly”.

There are many companies who are affordable, animal friendly, and produce high quality makeup products in- cluding: EcoTools, Milani, NYX, E.l.f etc.

Post a Comment

It is the goal of The Gustavian Weekly to spark a rich and meaningful conversation of varying viewpoints with readers. By submitting a comment you grant The Gustavian Weekly a perpetual license to reproduce your words, full name and website on this website and in its print edition. By submitting a comment, you also agree to not hold The Gustavian Weekly or Gustavus Adolphus College liable for anything relating to your comment, and agree to take full legal responsibility for your comment and to indemnify and hold harmless The Gustavian Weekly and Gustavus Adolphus College from any claims, lawsuits, judgments, legal fees and costs that it may incur on account of your comment or in enforcing this agreement. Comments that pass through our automatic spam filter are posted immediately. Comments that do not include the full first and last name of the visitor, include links or content relating to entities that do not directly relate to the content of the article, include profanity, or include copyrighted material may be removed from the site. The Weekly's Web Editor and Editor-in-Chief also reserve the right to remove comments for other reasons at their discretion. Criticism of The Weekly is welcome in the comment section of the website, and those wishing to express criticism of The Weekly are also encouraged to contact the Editor-in-Chief or submit a letter to the editor. Please be respectful, and thank you for your contribution!