The Gustavian Weekly

Letter to the Editor (11/8/19) | The Gustavian Weekly

By Chyna Yang - Community Contributor | November 8, 2019 | Letters to the Editor

In regard to Lauren Casey’s column about “The Great Poster Debate”:

As an Asian American student of a college with a white dominant student body, I am angry. This column perpetuates the divide of US vs. THEM on campus. Not only is this column unfair and unjust, it also represents the lack of understanding on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI).

The aspects she suggests these posters pinpoint is inaccurate and using misrepresented knowledge about propaganda to further the agenda. She writes that propaganda is supposed to “provoke others to act on an issue” but then contradicts this by writing that the posters are provoking the wrong feelings/emotions because this information is entirely untrue.

What are the “right feelings/emotions”? When is the right time to act on an issue? The Nobel Hall debate is less about the actual building but more about DEI. It is about the lack of resources needed to address DEI issues, the lack of support for students of color and the lack of having real, authentic conversations around campus. If you feel uncomfortable and have negative feelings towards these posters, you must ask yourself, “why?” The phrase, “For those who disapprove with how Gustavus handles diversity, as harsh as it sounds, they didn’t force any students to come here,” essentially means you do not understand.

Gustavus cannot be a “community” if they are not actively ENGAGING in the “conflicts and negative tension” and having real, authentic conversations that will help shape the future of the college and its student body. My call to action – challenge your perspective and speak to leaders and students of color about oppression and the navigation they endure every day. Challenge the unconscious world you live in. Only then will you understand an ounce of what the lived experience of many is. Thank you for your time.

Post a Comment




It is the goal of The Gustavian Weekly to spark a rich and meaningful conversation of varying viewpoints with readers. By submitting a comment you grant The Gustavian Weekly a perpetual license to reproduce your words, full name and website on this website and in its print edition. By submitting a comment, you also agree to not hold The Gustavian Weekly or Gustavus Adolphus College liable for anything relating to your comment, and agree to take full legal responsibility for your comment and to indemnify and hold harmless The Gustavian Weekly and Gustavus Adolphus College from any claims, lawsuits, judgments, legal fees and costs that it may incur on account of your comment or in enforcing this agreement. Comments that pass through our automatic spam filter are posted immediately. Comments that do not include the full first and last name of the visitor, include links or content relating to entities that do not directly relate to the content of the article, include profanity, or include copyrighted material may be removed from the site. The Weekly's Web Editor and Editor-in-Chief also reserve the right to remove comments for other reasons at their discretion. Criticism of The Weekly is welcome in the comment section of the website, and those wishing to express criticism of The Weekly are also encouraged to contact the Editor-in-Chief or submit a letter to the editor. Please be respectful, and thank you for your contribution!