The Gustavian Weekly

Letter to the Editor (3/7/2014)

By The Weekly Staff | March 7, 2014 | Letters to the Editor

Response to “No ifs, ands, or butts”

I am deeply disappointed in the representation of Student Senate presented in the recent article “No ifs, ands, or butts.” Ms Nickel’s writing showed a profound lack of knowledge concerning both the situation and the capabilities of the Student Senate.

Most frustrating was the claim that students see the replacement of the chairs in the Courtyard Cafe as “unnecessary.” Multiple surveys of the student population were given, the results showing an overwhelming majority supporting the renovation project. Even if this undertaking were scrapped, a redistribution of the funds to other student groups would not only lengthen the bureaucratic process that seems to already irk Ms. Nickels, but would also result in negligible gains for each recipient. In the same vein, the proposed alternative projects given by the author suggest that she possesses little to no knowledge of the cost of work on such grandiose scales or of the needs of the campus. The renovation of tunnels would far exceed the project budget that is presented as ‘wasteful,’ and would not be handled by Student Senate. In addition, placing any more sidewalks on this campus would result in little more than a sea of concrete with the end benefit of, at most, thirty to forty seconds faster travel time.

Sadly, most of these falsehoods and misunderstandings would have been corrected prior to the publication of the piece had the author bothered to contact anyone associated with the project. As a member of Student Senate I am saddened that you have had a poor personal experience with the organization, but to project your personal feelings at the body as a whole is irresponsible for a journalist.

I encourage the author, and all students on campus, to look out for a chance to help pick out the new chairs in the coming weeks.


Nick Nigro ’14

Student Senate Speaker

Post a Comment

It is the goal of The Gustavian Weekly to spark a rich and meaningful conversation of varying viewpoints with readers. By submitting a comment you grant The Gustavian Weekly a perpetual license to reproduce your words, full name and website on this website and in its print edition. By submitting a comment, you also agree to not hold The Gustavian Weekly or Gustavus Adolphus College liable for anything relating to your comment, and agree to take full legal responsibility for your comment and to indemnify and hold harmless The Gustavian Weekly and Gustavus Adolphus College from any claims, lawsuits, judgments, legal fees and costs that it may incur on account of your comment or in enforcing this agreement. Comments that pass through our automatic spam filter are posted immediately. Comments that do not include the full first and last name of the visitor, include links or content relating to entities that do not directly relate to the content of the article, include profanity, or include copyrighted material may be removed from the site. The Weekly's Web Editor and Editor-in-Chief also reserve the right to remove comments for other reasons at their discretion. Criticism of The Weekly is welcome in the comment section of the website, and those wishing to express criticism of The Weekly are also encouraged to contact the Editor-in-Chief or submit a letter to the editor. Please be respectful, and thank you for your contribution!