The Gustavian Weekly

Minnesota Twins: better than last season?

By Zac Isaak Staff Writer | April 25, 2014 | Sports & Fitness

After three consecutive 90-loss seasons, the Minnesota Twins’ mascot T.C. Bear may be the only member of the Twins organization who hasn’t lost the support of even the most fair-weather fans. Creative Commons

After three consecutive 90-loss seasons, the Minnesota Twins’ mascot T.C. Bear may be the only member of the Twins organization who hasn’t lost the support of even the most fair-weather fans. Creative Commons

Two weeks have passed since the start of Minnesota Twins’ 2014 season. Coming off of three straight seasons of losing over 90 games a season, the Twins are trying to turn things around.

During the off-season, the Twins made some interesting moves to help improve their team. The most notable moves the Twins made were directed towards their starting pitching rotation. According to SBNation, the Twins signed free agent Ricky Nolasco to a four-year contract worth $49 million. The Twins also signed former New York Yankee Pitcher Phil Hughes to a three-year contract worth $24 million.

In addition to signing Nolasco and Hughes, the Twins also signed Catcher Kurt Suzuki after moving Minnesota Twins’ biggest player Joe Mauer from catcher to first base in order to avoid some injuries associated with his former position. The Twins also signed former Twins Jason Bartlett and Jason Kubel to minor league contracts, but both Bartlett and Kubel made the Twins’ active roster during training camp. Bartlett has since retired, however, when a rehab assignment following an ankle injury wasn’t as effective as he had hoped it would be.

The Twins also addressed the manager position after re-signing Ron Gardenhire to a two-year contract, according to CBS Sports.

It’s easy to see that the Twins have been busy this off-season in preparation for the 2014 season. After two weeks of baseball, the big question is have the Minnesota Twins improved from last year’s team? Or, are the 2014 Minnesota Twins worse than last year’s team?

Right now, this question is difficult to answer fully, however the first couple weeks have helped me, as a fan, see what we can expect from the Twins this year.

First, the pitching is still in shambles. The newly acquired pitchers, Nolasco and Hughes, have been nothing spectacular since the start of the season. Both pitchers have had some moments of success, but their performance has been disappointing. According to the Minnesota Twins official website, both Nolasco and Hughes have an ERA above 6.0. Additionally, both pitchers have only won one game.

The Twins also re-signed starting pitchers Kevin Correia and Mike Pelfrey, who have been disappointing this season. Pelfrey and Correia both have a high ERA like Nolasco and Hughes, but have failed to win any games so far this season. The bright spot in the Twins’ rotation has been second-year veteran, Kyle Gibson. Gibson won his first three starts and posted a 0.93 ERA. Gibson has made the most of the games he’s played in so far this season.

It’s clear that the Twins have not made any significant improvements to the rotation other than calling Gibson up to the majors at the start of the season rather than before the All Star Break. It would appear that Correia and Pelfrey are simply placeholders for Twins pitching prospects Alex Meyer and Trevor May. When those two are called up to the majors someday, Twins fans are hopeful that the team will finally turn the corner and start to find the success they had in previous years.

The area that the Twins have shown the most significant improvement in this year is their offense. While it remains unclear if this surge of offense is merely a great streak of hitting or something to expect from the everyday roster, the Twins have had success hitting the ball and scoring runs so far this season.

One of the biggest surprises has been Twin’s utility player Chris Colabello. Colabello has seen a lot of time as the designated hitter, but he’s also played first base and right field. Colabello was called up towards the end of the Twins’ 2013 season and didn’t play particularly well during his time in the majors. This year has been a different story as Colabello has been the superstar on the Twins’ roster with his ability to get hits when it matters most. After two weeks of play, Colabello had 20 RBIs and nine doubles.

Colabello hasn’t been the only big offensive player for the Twins so far. Kubel has enjoyed much success since returning to the Twins. Third baseman Trevor Plouffe has also enjoyed a great start this season and has contributed significantly to the Twins’ offense. Mauer has not been hitting as well so far this year and has struck out more than in recent years, but the overall lineup has done well.

So, are the Twins better or worse? Offensively, they are better. Their pitching hasn’t been spectacular, but I wouldn’t say it’s been worse so far than last year’s pitching rotation. Pitching must improve in order for the Twins to be considered a contender in Major League Baseball.

1 Comment

Comments are the sole opinion of the visitor who submitted the comment and do not necessarily reflect the views of the author of the article, its editors, or The Gustavian Weekly or Gustavus Adolphus College as a whole.

  1. Maskot says:

    Wow it’s amazing! nice post and awesome thank you.

Post a Comment

It is the goal of The Gustavian Weekly to spark a rich and meaningful conversation of varying viewpoints with readers. By submitting a comment you grant The Gustavian Weekly a perpetual license to reproduce your words, full name and website on this website and in its print edition. By submitting a comment, you also agree to not hold The Gustavian Weekly or Gustavus Adolphus College liable for anything relating to your comment, and agree to take full legal responsibility for your comment and to indemnify and hold harmless The Gustavian Weekly and Gustavus Adolphus College from any claims, lawsuits, judgments, legal fees and costs that it may incur on account of your comment or in enforcing this agreement. Comments that pass through our automatic spam filter are posted immediately. Comments that do not include the full first and last name of the visitor, include links or content relating to entities that do not directly relate to the content of the article, include profanity, or include copyrighted material may be removed from the site. The Weekly's Web Editor and Editor-in-Chief also reserve the right to remove comments for other reasons at their discretion. Criticism of The Weekly is welcome in the comment section of the website, and those wishing to express criticism of The Weekly are also encouraged to contact the Editor-in-Chief or submit a letter to the editor. Please be respectful, and thank you for your contribution!