We are writing in defense of Amanda Nienow, her TA from J-Term, and the Gustavus chemistry department in general. We think that implicit in last week’s article were some bold insinuations which targeted all three of these entities, and that much of it was unfair. In short, we were under the impression that the department, Amanda Nienow and her TA were at fault for this incident concerning the stolen chemicals. Emphasis was placed on those people surrounding Timothy Shay (TJ), rather than the student himself.

While it is true that chemicals have not been tightly secured in the past, the chemistry department is working on improving this. There have already been new policies implemented, days after the incident, regarding the stockroom and its attendants. Never the less, we should not have to expect the worst of our students; perhaps we should instead be concerned that a peer would corrupt Gustavus’ values and image.

Additionally, “concerns” are being raised as to how Amanda Nienow conducted her class. This is enormously unfair. As Gustavus students in the sciences, we fully expect a hands-on experience. This is why chemistry and biology have 3-5 hour labs every week—it is simply the best way to internalize the material. Amanda was acting like any other responsible chemistry professor, providing her class with the best Gustavus quality education possible. It’s appalling that a student does something wrong, and yet the blame is placed on highly qualified educators. TJ acted independently, as is shown by the concern expressed by his peers. We also feel the need to mention that TJ was 20 years old– old enough to know what he was doing. Therefore, he and he alone is responsible for his actions.

We believe Amanda Nienow deserves an apology for the unjust charges implied in the articles over the last two weeks. One of our five values here at Gustavus is Justice: let’s maybe show a little to a great professor.

And lastly—congratulations to the Nienows for their new arrival!

Rose Langsjoen and Aliza Henning ‘10