The Gustavian Weekly

Don’t Judge a Book…

By David Roland Opinion Editorial | May 2, 2014 | Opinion

Recently a rally was held outside of the Chapel for increased transparancy on campus organized by the Our Gustavus campaign. A conglomerate for many transparancy-related organizations, like the Greens’ Divest Gustavus initiative. They work together, but they are not the same in practice or ideology.

After the rally, I heard many people criticizing it. citing such observations as: “they’re using petrolium products at a divestment rally!” and “who would protest the chapel?” When in actuality, 1) the balloons had questions related to vocation from the CSL, and 2) it was a rally not a protest.

I love a good discourse,  but these are simple, inaccurate observations that lack the necessary information to form accurate criticism. In other words, judging a book by its cover.

A similar lack of appreciatuion for the gray areas of life was shown last week in a number of people’s responses to the article, “Do We Need a Shift?” written by Senior Sam Hoppe.

The focus of the article was to say that exclusivly focusing on the suffering of those in poverty is counterproductive because it creates an us–them dichotomy based on pity. His idea was that to empower those in poverty, you don’t have to demonize those who have been relatively sucessful in their lives (e.g. Steve Jobs).

I disagree with the bulk of his column as a Democrat, but I still took the requisite time to find his point of view and review it with an open mind. This helped me realize me that his arguments about focusing on sports stars and entertainers to be a synectic argument. He was not saying we should ignore those in poverty and focus exclusively on the rich, but that a balance is needed. In many cases it even seemed that many critics of his article didn’t even read it.

Both are examples of people refusing to examine issues with an open mind. Losing a much- needed appreciation for complexity. In many of these cases what is needed is to forget your bias for a moment and explore the concept. In the rally’s case, walk over and explore what they are gathered for. And reading Sam’s article, examine his argument objectively and determine its validity.

Post a Comment

It is the goal of The Gustavian Weekly to spark a rich and meaningful conversation of varying viewpoints with readers. By submitting a comment you grant The Gustavian Weekly a perpetual license to reproduce your words, full name and website on this website and in its print edition. By submitting a comment, you also agree to not hold The Gustavian Weekly or Gustavus Adolphus College liable for anything relating to your comment, and agree to take full legal responsibility for your comment and to indemnify and hold harmless The Gustavian Weekly and Gustavus Adolphus College from any claims, lawsuits, judgments, legal fees and costs that it may incur on account of your comment or in enforcing this agreement. Comments that pass through our automatic spam filter are posted immediately. Comments that do not include the full first and last name of the visitor, include links or content relating to entities that do not directly relate to the content of the article, include profanity, or include copyrighted material may be removed from the site. The Weekly's Web Editor and Editor-in-Chief also reserve the right to remove comments for other reasons at their discretion. Criticism of The Weekly is welcome in the comment section of the website, and those wishing to express criticism of The Weekly are also encouraged to contact the Editor-in-Chief or submit a letter to the editor. Please be respectful, and thank you for your contribution!