The Gustavian Weekly

PEDs enhance performances and raise suspicions

By Linnea Moat Sports & Fitness Editor | March 1, 2013 | Sports & Fitness

Seven-time Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong has been stripped of his cycling titles after admitting to doping throughout his career. <em>Creative Commons</em>

Seven-time Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong has been stripped of his cycling titles after admitting to doping throughout his career. Creative Commons

Linnea_MoatPerformance Enhancing Drugs, or PEDs, have injected the sports world with controversy. After Lance Armstrong admitted to doping throughout his inspiring career and no one was inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame this year due to the candidates’ rumored steroid abuse, it has become increasingly difficult for fans to trust that their favorite athletes are earning their accolades honestly.

Despite PEDs being illegal in sports at all levels and warnings of how unhealthy they are for the body, athletes continue to turn to steroids to gain an edge over their competition.

In January, seven-time Tour de France winner Armstrong admitted to doping throughout his career. Armstrong told Oprah in a televised interview that he didn’t believe he was cheating by taking PEDs because he was sure other cyclists were doing the same.

“I went and looked up the definition of cheating, and the definition is to gain an advantage on a rival or foe. I didn’t view it that way. I viewed it as a level playing field,” Armstrong told Oprah.

Regardless of Armstrong’s opinion of his deeds, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) have concluded that he is guilty and have stripped him of his Tour de France titles.

Doping is not unique to cycling—in fact there isn’t a sport that hasn’t been marred at the professional level by steroid abuse.

Major League Baseball is a sport where PEDs have changed the entire game. In the 1990s players like Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Sammy Sosa made headlines for their athletic feats, the records they set and rumors of their steroid use. This winter Bonds and Clemens made headlines again, but this time it was because they had been denied entrance into the Baseball Hall of Fame. For the first time since 1996, no players were voted into the Hall, largely due to lingering concerns that the players who were on the ballot had used PEDs during their athletic careers.

Many sports have implemented stricter rules and testing procedures to try and combat steroid use, but it is still an issue that plagues all sports.

In a recent article in Grantland, Bill Simmons raises the question of whether or not fans will be able to continue to give athletes the ‘benefit of the doubt’ anymore, or if any seemingly fantastic athletic achievement will always be characterized by the speculation that it may have been caused by steroid use. It’s a fair point—when your favorite athletes let you down, it’s easy to be cynical. Fans are going to be cynical for years to come, because according to Simmons, cheating in professional sports has become an epidemic.

Post a Comment




It is the goal of The Gustavian Weekly to spark a rich and meaningful conversation of varying viewpoints with readers. By submitting a comment you grant The Gustavian Weekly a perpetual license to reproduce your words, full name and website on this website and in its print edition. By submitting a comment, you also agree to not hold The Gustavian Weekly or Gustavus Adolphus College liable for anything relating to your comment, and agree to take full legal responsibility for your comment and to indemnify and hold harmless The Gustavian Weekly and Gustavus Adolphus College from any claims, lawsuits, judgments, legal fees and costs that it may incur on account of your comment or in enforcing this agreement. Comments that pass through our automatic spam filter are posted immediately. Comments that do not include the full first and last name of the visitor, include links or content relating to entities that do not directly relate to the content of the article, include profanity, or include copyrighted material may be removed from the site. The Weekly's Web Editor and Editor-in-Chief also reserve the right to remove comments for other reasons at their discretion. Criticism of The Weekly is welcome in the comment section of the website, and those wishing to express criticism of The Weekly are also encouraged to contact the Editor-in-Chief or submit a letter to the editor. Please be respectful, and thank you for your contribution!