The Gustavian Weekly

Reading this will make you cooler

By Mackenzie McCann Staff Columnist | February 22, 2013 | Opinion

No one drops beats like a dead horse. <em>Mackenzie McCann</em>

No one drops beats like a dead horse. Mackenzie McCann

Eric Whitacre beats dead horse

Mackenzie_McCannNowadays the internet is making it easier than ever for musicians, composers, and 14-year-old rich girls to get their music out into the world and into the ears of any human with access to a computer. However, the same artists who gain their fame and success on the World Wide Web can easily use its tools to exploit their fans into supporting some of their ridiculous endeavors.

Take Eric Whitacre, for example. Anyone who has ever been a part of an organized musical ensemble at some point in their life knows exactly who this golden-locked beauty of a man is. But, if you happen to live under a very unmusical rock, let me explain. Whitacre is a super-popular, Grammy-winning, music-composing, choir-and-band-directing god.

Over the past several years he has organized a “Virtual Choir” that has sprung him into global fame. Long story short, he uploaded a video of himself conducting his song, “Lux Aurumque,” received over 185 separate videos from 12 different countries of people singing his music, spliced together the audio from each, and voila!—the first Virtual Choir video was born. According to his website, the video gained over a million views in the first two months and has now acquired over 3 million. Now, after three Virtual Choir videos (each new one receiving less and less media attention and subsequently, fewer views), Whitacre and his team have set their sights on a fourth installment. But here’s the catch: it will be completely fan-funded!

Seems legit—the entire global Whitacre fandom coming together to create a piece of popular culture with their voices and bank accounts. I wasn’t completely turned off by the idea until I discovered the Kickstarter campaign of $100,000 to fund the project. Wait . . . $100,000?! “Believe it or not, VC3 alone cost us way more than $100,000 to make,” his Kickstarter page justifiably explains. The aforementioned video has received only about 500,000 views.

For someone who has a Twitter stream jam-packed with pop culture jabs and the latest musical memes, Whitacre seems surprisingly out of touch with the ways of the almighty internet. Nowadays web sensations lose their hype as quickly as they gain it (Remember the Gustavus Meme page on Facebook? Oh yeah, that exists). However, I’ve come to believe that Whitacre doesn’t consider his Virtual Choir videos to be anything near comparable to flashmobs or the Harlem Shake (which is already so last week), otherwise, they probably would have died off alongside Nyan Cat and Double Rainbow guy. I honestly hate to say it, but Virtual Choir is past its prime.

There must be something better that Whitacre can spend his, time, energy, and fans’ money on than a YouTube video, that (if the exponential decay graph is accurate) will receive only about 250,000 views. He could start a scholarship fund for aspiring musicians and composers. He could establish a music program for underprivileged children. He could buy me a really nice engagement ring. There is just no way to convince me that any video that can be viewed for free on the internet is worth $100,000 to make. The sad punchline to this story is that Whitacre has exceeded his goal by over $20,000. I mean, come on, Rebecca Black only had to pay $4,000, and look how many views her video has!

Post a Comment




It is the goal of The Gustavian Weekly to spark a rich and meaningful conversation of varying viewpoints with readers. By submitting a comment you grant The Gustavian Weekly a perpetual license to reproduce your words, full name and website on this website and in its print edition. By submitting a comment, you also agree to not hold The Gustavian Weekly or Gustavus Adolphus College liable for anything relating to your comment, and agree to take full legal responsibility for your comment and to indemnify and hold harmless The Gustavian Weekly and Gustavus Adolphus College from any claims, lawsuits, judgments, legal fees and costs that it may incur on account of your comment or in enforcing this agreement. Comments that pass through our automatic spam filter are posted immediately. Comments that do not include the full first and last name of the visitor, include links or content relating to entities that do not directly relate to the content of the article, include profanity, or include copyrighted material may be removed from the site. The Weekly's Web Editor and Editor-in-Chief also reserve the right to remove comments for other reasons at their discretion. Criticism of The Weekly is welcome in the comment section of the website, and those wishing to express criticism of The Weekly are also encouraged to contact the Editor-in-Chief or submit a letter to the editor. Please be respectful, and thank you for your contribution!